Article:		Typeless Schemas and Services
Subject:		so what's the gain using anonymous types?
Date:		2004-04-05 08:21:10
From:		Eric Schwarzenbach
Response to: so what's the gain using anonymous types?
You (as you note) are trading off reuse. To be able to reuse a given type, you can trade the complexity of adding 1 additional name to be able to reuse it for multiple elements. This seems a pretty good trade. It seems to me you ought to have better justification for such a sweeping rule. Besides, the additional complexity of those type names is hidden from the standpoint of document instances.

Previous Message

Up

Next Message

• so what's the gain using anonymous types?
  2004-04-05 08:36:59 Rich Salz