Article:		Typeless Schemas and Services
Subject:		so what's the gain using anonymous types?
Date:		2004-04-03 07:22:48
From:		Rich Salz
Response to: so what's the gain using anonymous types?
I believe it's less complex to have one 'name' for the structure (or type, if you want to call it that), rather than two. In other words, when you see tns:Foo, you know what the XML inside is going to look like. If you add another level of indirection, by using XSD types, you can still do it but it's more complicated. I don't know if I'd call that just "philosophy," perhaps "engineering philosophy." :)

Previous Message

Up

Next Message

• so what's the gain using anonymous types?
  2004-04-05 08:21:10 Eric Schwarzenbach
  • so what's the gain using anonymous types?
    2004-04-05 08:36:59 Rich Salz